<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Second Look&#8230; NFC East</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.mactalksnfl.co.uk/blog/predictions/second-look-nfc-east/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.mactalksnfl.co.uk/blog/predictions/second-look-nfc-east</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 27 Oct 2011 16:12:03 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: NFL News &#124; Predictions &#124; Players</title>
		<link>http://www.mactalksnfl.co.uk/blog/predictions/second-look-nfc-east/comment-page-1#comment-135</link>
		<dc:creator>NFL News &#124; Predictions &#124; Players</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Sep 2009 17:00:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mactalksnfl.co.uk/?p=392#comment-135</guid>
		<description>[...] the NFC, I have the Giants topping the east. I&#8217;m hoping that the Redskins can surprise me here and edge a playoff spot, but I don&#8217;t [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] the NFC, I have the Giants topping the east. I&#8217;m hoping that the Redskins can surprise me here and edge a playoff spot, but I don&#8217;t [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew</title>
		<link>http://www.mactalksnfl.co.uk/blog/predictions/second-look-nfc-east/comment-page-1#comment-57</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Jul 2009 12:30:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mactalksnfl.co.uk/?p=392#comment-57</guid>
		<description>It is a little bit. But I think this is the hardest division to call of them all, and you could mix up P2 though P4 in anyway and it wouldn&#039;t look silly.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It is a little bit. But I think this is the hardest division to call of them all, and you could mix up P2 though P4 in anyway and it wouldn&#8217;t look silly.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Graham</title>
		<link>http://www.mactalksnfl.co.uk/blog/predictions/second-look-nfc-east/comment-page-1#comment-55</link>
		<dc:creator>Graham</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Jul 2009 23:14:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mactalksnfl.co.uk/?p=392#comment-55</guid>
		<description>It must have been painful for Andrew to put the Skins in p4 there.  

Call me strange but I can see the Cowboys making P2, maybe even P1.  There is a buzz about the Cowboys at the moment and I can see it leading to good things.   Mind you my money was on the Cowboys to be one of the teams at Wembley this year....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It must have been painful for Andrew to put the Skins in p4 there.  </p>
<p>Call me strange but I can see the Cowboys making P2, maybe even P1.  There is a buzz about the Cowboys at the moment and I can see it leading to good things.   Mind you my money was on the Cowboys to be one of the teams at Wembley this year&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

